
How to Evaluate a Documentation and Training Partner
Choosing the wrong documentation partner is expensive. Here's how to evaluate them before the contract is signed.

Ask most project managers what documentation costs and you'll get a number — maybe a line item from the last project budget, maybe an estimate based on writer hours. Ask them what documentation actually costs, including the time their engineers spent reviewing drafts, the rework after the customer rejected the first submission, the project closeout that slipped by three weeks because the manuals weren't done — and the answer gets much less precise. That's the problem. The costs that show up on a spreadsheet are a fraction of the real expense.
For system integrators, documentation costs are particularly hard to isolate because the work is distributed across the project team. The lead engineer writes the operations manual between commissioning tasks. The project manager assembles the documentation package from various contributors. A junior engineer creates the illustrated parts breakdown. None of these people have 'documentation' in their job title, and their time isn't tracked against a documentation budget — it's tracked against the project.
The result is that documentation appears to cost very little, because the real costs are hidden inside engineering and project management line items. This creates a distorted picture that makes in-house documentation look far more economical than it actually is — and makes the case for outsourcing harder to build, even when outsourcing would clearly save money.
OEMs face a different version of the same problem. Documentation costs are spread across multiple departments — engineering, marketing, customer support, training — with no single owner tracking the total spend. Engineering creates the initial technical content. Marketing reformats it for customer-facing materials. Customer support fields calls when the documentation is inadequate. Training develops programs to compensate for what the manuals don't cover.
Each department sees its own slice of the cost and assumes it's manageable. Nobody aggregates the full picture. When they do, the number is often startling — and it becomes immediately clear that a coordinated, professional approach to documentation would cost less than the fragmented, department-by-department spend that's been accumulating for years.
The first step toward controlling documentation costs is making them visible. That means tracking engineer time spent on documentation separately from engineering work. It means accounting for rework cycles, delayed milestones, and the downstream support costs that stem from inadequate content. It means looking at the full lifecycle cost, not just the cost of producing the first draft.
Once the real cost is visible, the decision framework changes. Most organizations that do this analysis find that professional documentation support — whether through an internal team or an outsourced partner — is significantly less expensive than the distributed, untracked costs they've been absorbing. The documentation doesn't get cheaper. It just stops being invisible.
At SANTECH, we help organizations see the full picture. We work with integrators and OEMs to deliver documentation and training that's professionally produced, on schedule, and within a defined budget — replacing the hidden, distributed costs with a clear, predictable investment. If you suspect documentation is costing more than anyone realizes, we can help you find out.
Let’s discuss how SANTECH can help modernize your technical documentation and training programs.